ANALISIS PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 128/PUU-XXIII/2025 TENTANG LARANGAN RANGKAP JABATAN BAGI MENTERI DAN WAKIL MENTERI PERSPEKTIF SIYASAH DUSTURIYAH
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56015/gjikplp.v13i10.1313Abstract
The practice of deputy ministers concurrently holding positions as commissioners of State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs) has long constituted an unresolved constitutional issue in Indonesian positive law. Article 23 of Law Number 39 of 2008 on State Ministries only prohibits concurrent office-holding for ministers, thereby creating a legal gap that has been exploited systematically. This study aims to analyze the legal considerations of judges, the legal implications, and the siyasah dusturiyah perspective on Constitutional Court Decision Number 128/PUU-XXIII/2025 concerning the prohibition of concurrent office-holding for ministers and deputy ministers. The method employed is normative juridical research utilizing a statute approach and case approach, with descriptive-prescriptive qualitative analysis. The findings reveal three principal conclusions: first, the Constitutional Court constructed its legal reasoning upon the principles of equality before the law, legal certainty, and good governance, employing conditional constitutional interpretation to extend the normative scope of Article 23 to deputy ministers; second, the decision carries erga omnes effect, producing significant normative-legislative, executive-institutional, and constitutional jurisprudential implications, including the obligation to relinquish concurrent positions within a two-year grace period; third, the siyasah dusturiyah perspective affirms the prohibition through the principles of amanah, 'adl, al-wizārah, and maslahah mursalah, all of which are substantively convergent with the decision's ratio decidendi. This study concludes that the prohibition on concurrent office-holding is not merely a formal legal obligation, but an ethical and moral imperative intrinsic to the nature of trustworthy leadership in both Islamic governance and modern constitutionalism.
References
Al-Mawardi, I. (2006). Al-aḥkām al-sulṭāniyyah: Prinsip-prinsip penyelenggaraan negara Islam (F. Bahri, Trans.). Darul Falah.
Aulia, T. (2025). Analisis yuridis dan fiqh siyasah dusturiyah terhadap praktik rangkap jabatan menteri dan wakil menteri Kabinet Merah Putih berdasarkan UU No. 39 Tahun 2008 tentang Kementerian Negara [Skripsi, UIN Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq Jember]. Repositori UIN KHAS. https://digilib.uinkhas.ac.id/51963/
Dicey, A. V. (1885). Introduction to the study of the law of the constitution. Macmillan.
Ibrahim, J. (2005). Teori dan metode penelitian hukum normatif. Bayumedia Publishing.
Ismuhadi & Khalid. (2025). Tinjauan yuridis terhadap rangkap jabatan menteri atau wakil menteri sebagai komisaris BUMN perspektif fiqh siyasah. QANUN: Journal of Islamic Laws and Studies, 4(2), 1069–1073. https://doi.org/10.58738/qanun.v4i2.1198
Julyano, M., & Sulistyawan, A. Y. (2019). PEMAHAMAN TERHADAP ASAS KEPASTIAN HUKUM MELALUI KONSTRUKSI PENALARAN POSITIVISME HUKUM. CREPIDO, 1(1), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.14710/crepido.1.1.13-22
Kamizi, F., Sarkowi, S., Marzuki, M., & Irawan, D. (2025). Konsep Kekuasaan Dalam Siyasah Dusturiyah Dan Relevansinya Terhadap Prinsip Kedaulatan Rakyat di Indonesia. ELQONUN: Jurnal Hukum Ketatanegaraan, 3(1), 17–24. https://doi.org/10.19109/elqonun.v3i1.31043
Kommers, D. P. (1997). The constitutional jurisprudence of the Federal Republic of Germany. Duke University Press.
Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. (2020). Putusan Nomor 80/PUU-XVII/2019. https://www.mkri.id/public/content/persidangan/putusan/putusan_mkri_4679_1598498849.pdf
Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. (2026). Putusan Nomor 128/PUU-XXIII/2025. https://www.mkri.id/public/content/persidangan/putusan/putusan_mkri_13098_1756371293.pdf
Marzuki, P. M. (2019). Penelitian hukum (Edisi Revisi). Kencana Prenadamedia Group.
Muhaimin. (2020). Metode penelitian hukum. Mataram University Press.
Otto, J. M. (2008). Sharia and national law in Muslim countries: Tensions and opportunities for Dutch and EU foreign policy. Leiden University Press.
Pratama, W. D., & Khalid. (2025). Analisis Yuridis Larangan Rangkap Jabatan Wakil Menteri Sebagai Komisaris BUMN Berdasarkan Putusan MK Nomor 128/PUU-XXIII/2025 Perspektif Siyasah Dusturiyah. Jurnal Hukum Sasana, 11(1), 244–256. https://doi.org/10.31599/sasana.v11i1.5251
Putri, A. R., & Mahanani, A. E. E. (2022). Putusan positive legislature pada Mahkamah Konstitusi dan implikasinya terhadap pembentukan undang-undang. Yustisia Tirtayasa, 2(1), 62–75. https://doi.org/10.51825/yta.v2i1.13906
Radbruch, G. (1950). Rechtsphilosophie. Koehler Verlag.
Rukha, R. S., & Basani, C. S. (2026). Legalitas Rangkap Jabatan Wakil Menteri Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 128/PUU-XXIII/2025: Studi terhadap Wakil Menteri Non-Pegawai Negeri Sipil dalam Tinjauan Asas Kepastian Hukum dan Profesionalitas. UNES Law Review, 8(4), 1395–1412. https://doi.org/10.31933/0swezd48
Sakdi, S., Siswanto, M., & Bustomi, I. (2026). ANALISIS YURIDIS TERHADAP PUTUSAN MK NOMOR 128/PUU XXIII/2025: KONSTITUSIONALITAS RANGKAP JABATAN WAKIL MENTERI. Jurnal Yustitia, 27(1), 21–44.
Saputra, A. A., Fallah, M. A. B., Indranarwasti, V. P., & Kosasih, Y. A. B. (2024). Analisis Regulasi Larangan Rangkap Jabatan Dalam Pemerintahan Indonesia sebagai Dukungan Penerapan Good Corporate Governance. Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan, 10(14), 61–76. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13343212
Sihombing, E. N. A. M. (2022). Pengujian norma hukum dalam sistem perundang-undangan Indonesia: Perbandingan antara Mahkamah Konstitusi dan Mahkamah Agung. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, 11(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.11.1.2022.1-20
Silalahi, W., & Wijaya, G. (2025). Pengujian Perundang-Undangan Dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia: Analisis Legislative Review, Executive Review, dan Judicial Review. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa, 3(1), 67–76.
Sukmawan, Y. A. (2025). Metode penelitian hukum normatif dan empiris sebagai strategi penguatan perspektif kajian ilmu hukum. Notary Law Journal, 4(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.20527/nolaj.v4i1.116
Sulastri, D., Effendi, L., Wahyudin, M. Y., & Sanmas, A. (2026). State Responsibility in Implementing Bandung City Regional Regulation Number 24 of 2012 concerning the Implementation and Handling of Social Welfare from the Siyasah Maliyah Perspective. Al-Afkar, Journal For Islamic Studies, 9(2), 2835–2847. https://doi.org/10.31943/afkarjournal.v9i2.3479
Sunggono, B. (2003). Metode penelitian hukum (Cetakan ke-5). PT RajaGrafindo Persada.
Transparency International Indonesia. (2025). Laporan pemantauan rangkap jabatan wakil menteri Kabinet Merah Putih. TII.
United Nations Development Programme. (1997). Governance for sustainable human development: A UNDP policy document. UNDP.
Wahyudin, M. Y., & Zulfaidah, R. (2026). Constitutional and Siyasah Dusturiyah Review of Neglected Child Protection in Purwakarta. Siyasah Dusturiyah: State Law Review, 2(1), 20–37. https://doi.org/10.65101/vatqxy25
Wamen Rangkap Jabatan Komisaris BUMN, Istana Beri Penjelasan. (t.t.). Diambil 19 Juli 2026, dari https://www.detik.com/sumut/berita/d-8027059/wamen-rangkap-jabatan-komisaris-bumn-istana-beri-penjelasan
Winedar, A. N., Desi, D., Sapira, N. P., & Novalia, S. (2026). PRINSIP AMANAH DALAM FIQH SIYASAH DAN RELEVANSINYA TERHADAP KINERJA PEJABAT PUBLIK DI INDONESIA. JURNAL ILMIAH NUSANTARA, 3(4), 917–928. https://doi.org/10.61722/jinu.v3i4.10450
Wiraguna, S. A. (2024). Metode normatif dan empiris dalam penelitian hukum: Studi eksploratif di Indonesia. Public Sphere: Jurnal Sosial Politik, Pemerintahan dan Hukum, 3(3), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.56921/pubs.v3i3.1390
Zuhri, R. A., & Khalid. (2025). Analisis yuridis tentang rangkap jabatan terhadap menteri negara. Pagaruyuang Law Journal, 9(2), 209–222. https://doi.org/10.31869/plj.v9i2.6904
