ANTISIPASI KERUGIAN KONSUMEN AKIBAT KLAUSULA BAKU DALAM PERJANJIAN PINJAMAN ONLINE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56015/gjikplp.v13i7.1322Keywords:
klausula baku, perjanjian, pinjaman online, kerugian, konsumenAbstract
Consumers and business actors often have an unequal position, resulting in losses for consumers, including the existence of standard clauses that cause these losses. The purpose of this study is to analyze the anticipated losses that consumers can incur due to standard clauses in agreements.online This study examines both short-term preventive measures and long-term repressive measures. The research was conducted using normative methods and legislative, conceptual, and case-based approaches. The data used were secondary data collected through literature review. The results indicate that short-term measures that consumers can take to avoid losses arising from standard clauses in loan agreements include:online is to ensure legality platform loan online to be registered with the OJK, identify standard clauses that have the potential to cause losses so that they can be sorted out platform which one presents the smallest risk, collecting electronic document evidence, not carelessly providing personal data that is not required, submitting an internal objection mechanism through call center platform loan online, and submit a proposal to the Business Competition Commission to correct the standard clauses in the agreement. Meanwhile, long-term efforts that consumers must take if they experience losses include filing an objection with the business actor to request information regarding the losses resulting from the standard clause. Consumers can then report this to the Financial Services Authority (OJK) so that the provider is subject to administrative sanctions and dispute resolution mechanisms stipulated in Law No. 8 of 1999, both non-litigation and litigation through criminal prosecution of the business actor. Finally, consumers can encourage the reconstruction of regulations that provide protection for consumers affected by the standard clause in loan agreements.online by submitting an application to the Constitutional Court.<line-break/>Keywords: standard clauses, agreements, loans online, loss, consumer
References
Ahmad, R., Hengkenang, R. M., & Putri, M. A. (2026). Perlindungan Konsumen Terhadap Klausul Baku Yang Merugikan Pada Layanan Pinjaman Online Berbasis Aplikasi. Perahu (Penerangan Hukum): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 14(1), 126–131.
Bangun, A. B., & Pakpahan, M. E. (2026). Analisa Hukum Perjanjian Pinjam Meminjam Berbasis Fintech Berdasarkan Peraturan OJK Nomor 40 Tahun 2024. Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum, 4(2), 7022–7032.
Dewi, J. S., & Prayuti, Y. (2026). Rekonstruksi Keseimbangan Kontraktual dalam Perjanjian Kredit Perbankan: Kritik terhadap Dominasi Klausula Baku Pasca Pojk Perlindungan Konsumen 2023. Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, 7(4).
Djamaluddin, M. F. F. R., Rahman, S., & Salmawati. (2025). The Contractual Relationship of Online Motorcycle Taxis in Contract Law: Imbalance, Liability, and the Crisis of Legal Certainty. Advanced Private Legal Insights, 1(2), 1–11.
Fiani, M. I. (2024). Analisis Pencantuman Klausula Eksonerasi Ditinjau Dari Asas Kebebasan Berkontrak Di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalise, 5(4).
Gunawan, J., & Waluyo, B. M. (2021). Perjanjian Baku: Masalah dan Solusi. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH.
Muslikin, S. H. K., Frederik, W., & Lengkong, N. (2025). Peran Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK) Dalam Memberantas Pinjaman Online (Fintech) Ilegal Di Indonesia. Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research, 5342–5358.
Priyambodho, M. F. G. (2025). Tinjauan Yuridis Pelaksanaan Perjanjian Pinjam-Meminjam secara Online (Studi Kasus Pada Aplikasi Akulaku). Universitas Islam Sultan Agung Semarang.
Purwito, E. (2023). Konsep Perlindungan Hukum Konsumen dan Tanggung Jawab Hukum Pelaku Usaha terhadap Produk Gula Pasir Kadaluarsa Di Kota Surabaya. DEKRIT (Jurnal Magister Ilmu Hukum), 13(1), 109–129.
Putri, A. C. L. (2021). Tinjauan Yiridis terhadap Klausula Baku dalam Syarat dan Ketentuan Aplikasi Online E-Commerce. Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta.
Rahmadani, E. (2025). Akibat Hukum Pencantuman Klausula Eksonerasi dalam Polis Asuransi Jiwa serta Pengawasan oleh Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK). Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, 6(4).
Rudy, D. G., Sarjana, I. M., Putrawan, S., Sutama, I. B. P., Sukranata, A. A. K., & Priyanto, I. M. D. (2016). Buku Ajar Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen. Universitas Udayana.
Sigalingging, B. P., Mutiarany, & Tompul, V. B. (2025). Implikasi POJK Nomor 22 Tahun 2023 terhadap Perlindungan Hukum Pengguna Layanan Pinjaman Online. Krisna Law: Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum Universitas Krisnadwipayana, 7(1), 1–13.
Tobing, D. M. L. (2019). Klausula Baku: Paradoks dalam Penegakan Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Widijantoro, J. (2020). Masalah Perlindungan Konsumen Jasa Keuangan dalam Penggunaan Unfair Contract Terms di Indonesia. GIZ - Customer Protection in ASEAN.
