IMPLEMENTASI PROGRAM REVITALISASI BAHASA DAERAH OLEH KANTOR BAHASA PROVINSI KALIMANTAN TIMUR

Studi pada Bahasa Kenyah di Desa Pampang Kota Samarinda

Authors

  • Sonya Soraya Ghazlina Universitas Mulawarman
  • Santi Rande Program Studi Magister Administrasi Publik
  • Aji Ratna Kusuma Program Studi Magister Administrasi Publik
  • Fajar Apriani Universitas Mulawarman

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56015/gjikplp.v11i2.348

Keywords:

Local Language Revitalization Program, Language Revitalization, Local Language, Revitalization Policy, Revitalization Program

Abstract

This study aims to determine the implementation of the Kenyah Language Revitalization Program by the East Kalimantan Provincial Language Office in Pampang Village, Samarinda City, and its inhibiting factors. This research uses a descriptive type with qualitative methods, with primary data sources through interviews with key informants of the Kenyah Language Revitalization Coordinator of the East Kalimantan Provincial Language Office. Secondary data sources include press release information, documents, and archives related to the revitalization program. Data collection techniques include observation, interviews, and documentation. The data analysis used was an interactive model analysis developed by Miles, Huberman and Saldana. The implementation of the Kenyah Language revitalization program in Pampang Village was successfully carried out by the East Kalimantan Provincial Language Office as the implementor. This is evident from the six stages of the regional language revitalization program from the 17th episode of the Merdeka Belajar curriculum that have achieved their goals. Starting from the coordination meeting stage, group discussions, teacher training, transmission to the Provincial Mother Language Bud Festival were successfully realized in the revitalization of Kenyah language in Pampang Village. However, during the process it turned out that there were obstacles that caused each stage not to be maximized perfectly, namely: 1) not maximizing the implementation of Samarinda Mayor Regulation Number 15 of 2022 which does not have specific policy derivatives related to local content-based revitalization and 2) community-based revitalization modules that cannot be applied in Pampang Village schools due to the absence of local content of Kenyah Language in the school.

Author Biographies

Sonya Soraya Ghazlina, Universitas Mulawarman

Program Studi Administrasi Publik,

Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik

Santi Rande, Program Studi Magister Administrasi Publik

Program Studi Administrasi Publik,

Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik

Aji Ratna Kusuma, Program Studi Magister Administrasi Publik

Program Studi Administrasi Publik,

Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik

References

Abdul, K. M. (2019). “Implementasi Kebijakan Penataan Pedagang Kaki Lima (Studi Kasus di Pasar Sore Kota Tanjung Selor Kabupaten Bulungan)”. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Negara 9(1), 50-61. Diunduh dari: http://ejournal.upnjatim.ac.id/index.php/jdg/article/view/1420

Ahsyar, M. (2022). “Revitalisasi Bahasa Dan Sastra Daerah diNTB: Dilema Antara Implementasi Dan Regulasi Sebagai Muatan Lokal”. Jurnal Lisdaya, 16(1), 20-26. Diunduh dari: https://lisdaya.unram.ac.id/index.php/lisdaya/article/view/11

Badan Pengembangan dan Pembinaan Bahasa. 2019. “Bahasa dan Peta di Indonesia”, https://petabahasa.kemdikbud.go.id/index.php (diakses 8 September 2023)

Bujangga, H. (2022). “Revitalisasi Bahasa Gayo dan Penuturnya.” Proceedings Icis, 1(1), 326-336. Diunduh dari: https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=id&user=J_qbSzYAAAAJ&citation_for_view=J_qbSzYAAAAJ:2osOgNQ5qMEC

Hardyanto. 2023. “Merdeka Belajar untuk Revitalisasi Bahasa Daerah yang Terancam”. Sekretariat Kabinet Indonesia. https://setkab.go.id/merdeka-belajar-untuk-revitalisasi-bahasa-daerah-yang-terancam/ (diakses 7 September 2023). https://kantorbahasakaltim.kemdikbud.go.id/?p=1889. (diakses 7 September 2023)

Kamma, A. (2016). “Usaha Pemertahanan dan Revitalisasi Bahasa Ponosakan”. Jurnal Kadera Bahasa, 8(2), 214-217. Diunduh dari: https://kaderabahasa.kemdikbud.go.id/jurnal/index.php/kaderabahasa

Kantor Bahasa Provinsi Kalimantan Timur. 2022. “FTBI di Kaltim 2022 Jadikan Revitalisasi Bahasa Daerah Lebih Menyenangkan bagi Generasi Muda”.

Mailani, O., dkk. (2022). “Bahasa Sebagai Alat Komunikasi Dalam Kehidupan Manusia”. IHSA Institute 2(2), 2-. Diunduh dari: www.plus62.isha.or.id/index.php/kampret

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis (a Methods Sourcebook) (3rd ed.). United States of America: SAGE Publications, Inc.

Naibaho, L., Nadeak, B., & Sormin, E. (2023). Pelestarian Bahasa Daerah Sebagai Jati Diri Bangsa Indonesia. (1st ed.). Bandung: Widina Bhakti Persada Bandung. E-book diunduh dari: www.penerbitwidina.com

Purwanto, N. A. (2010). Administrasi Pendidikan (Teori dan Praktik di Lembaga Pendidikan) (1st ed.). Yogyakarta: Intishar Publshing.

Subarsono, A. (2005). Analisis Kebijakan Publik (11th ed.). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Downloads

Published

2025-01-10