ANALISIS YURIDIS PENGENAAN PASAL PENCEMARAN NAMA BAIK DAN CYBERBULLYING DALAM KASUS PENYEBARAN DATA PRIBADI OLEH FINTECH LENDING
Keywords:
Cyberbullying, Fintech Lending, Personal Data Protection, Strict Liability, UU ITEAbstract
The practice of debt collection in peer-to-peer lending (fintech lending) in Indonesia is often characterized by digital intimidation and misuse of personal data, violating the constitutional rights of customers. This study aims to empirically examine the effectiveness of defamation articles in the ITE Law (Electronic Information and Transactions Law) and protection instruments in the PDP Law (Personal Data Protection Law) on the guarantee of customers' digital dignity protection. This study employs a quantitative method with a juridical-empirical approach. Data were collected via questionnaires from 100 fintech users selected using purposive sampling technique and analyzed using multiple linear regression. The results indicate that both regulations simultaneously have a positive and significant effect on customer protection, with a contribution of influence (R2) of 58.2%. Partially, the PDP Law was found to have a more dominant impact (β = 0.452) compared to the ITE Law (β = 0.284), indicating that customers feel more protected through preventive data governance mechanisms than reactive criminal approaches. This study concludes that although regulations are on the right track, law enforcement effectiveness is still hindered by a gap of 41.8%, influenced by the complexity of proving mens rea and inter-institutional bureaucracy. Therefore, the implementation of the strict liability principle for fintech operators is recommended to mitigate the risk of cyberbullying in the future.
References
Arner, D. W., Buckley, R. P., & Zetzsche, D. A. (2022). Fintech, RegTech, and the Reconceptualization of Financial Regulation. Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business, 42(1), 1-48.
Aulia, R., & Kusuma, A. (2021). Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Data Pribadi Peminjam dalam Layanan Pinjaman Online (Peer to Peer Lending). Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 28(2), 345-367. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol28.iss2.art5
Barkatullah, A. H. (2022). Urgensi Penerapan Prinsip Strict Liability dalam Sengketa E-Commerce dan Fintech di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Bonum Commune, 5(1), 12-25.
Buckley, R. P. (2023). The Evolution of Fintech: A New Post-Crisis Paradigm? Banking & Finance Law Review, 38(2), 189-215.
Chen, L. (2022). Data Privacy and Digital Finance: A Comparative Analysis of Regulatory Frameworks in Asia. Telecommunications Policy, 46(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2022.102315
Determann, L. (2021). Determann's Field Guide to Data Privacy Law: International Corporate Compliance. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Disemadi, H. S. (2021). Lenses of Legal Research on Fintech Peer-to-Peer Lending in Indonesia. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 21(2), 189-204. https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2021.V21.189-204
Fauzi, R., Pratama, B., & Nugraha, S. (2023). Konstruksi Hukum Pasal Pengancaman Siber dalam Perspektif Victimology. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 52(3), 256-267. https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.52.3.2023.256-267
Gikay, A. A. (2022). European Union Personal Data Protection Law and Financial Technology. European Journal of Law and Technology, 13(1).
Greenleaf, G. (2022). Asian Data Privacy Laws: Trade & Human Rights Perspectives. International Data Privacy Law, 12(1), 3-10. https://doi.org/10.1093/idpl/ipac001
Hidayat, A., Purnomo, S., & Santoso, B. (2023). Batasan Hak Tagih dan Hak Privasi: Studi Yuridis terhadap Sengketa Fintech di Pengadilan Negeri. Jurnal Konstitusi, 20(1), 112-135. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk2016
Kusuma, I. W. (2022). Implementasi Undang-Undang Perlindungan Data Pribadi dalam Menanggulangi Kebocoran Data Nasabah Perbankan. Mimbar Hukum, 34(2), 401-420. https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.68921
Latifiani, D. (2021). Human Rights Perspective on Personal Data Protection in Indonesia. Jurnal Media Hukum, 28(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.18196/jmh.2021.0163.1-16
Madsud, S., & Al-Irsyad, M. (2023). Pelindungan Hukum bagi Debitur Pinjaman Online atas Penyebaran Data Pribadi oleh Kreditur. Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, 4(2).
Mitrou, L. (2021). The Right to Digital Dignity: Data Protection Challenges in the Fintech Era. European Data Protection Law Review, 7(3), 345-359. https://doi.org/10.21552/edpl/2021/3/7
Ningsih, A. S. (2021). Perlindungan Konsumen dalam Era Ekonomi Digital: Tantangan Penegakan Hukum Fintech Lending. Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 23(2), 211-230.
Permana, T. A. (2023). Dualisme Penegakan Hukum Siber: Irisan Kewenangan OJK dan Polri dalam Kasus Pinjol Ilegal. Arena Hukum, 16(1), 88-105.
Prasetyo, T. (2022). Kebijakan Hukum Pidana dalam Penanggulangan Cyberbullying Berbasis Hutang Piutang. Jurnal Rechtsvinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, 11(2), 177-195. https://doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v11i2.890
Santoso, L. (2023). Aspek Pidana Penyalahgunaan Data Pribadi dalam Perspektif UU ITE dan KUHP. Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 17(1), 33-50.
Sari, I. P. (2022). Efektivitas Sanksi Administratif dan Pidana dalam Undang-Undang Perlindungan Data Pribadi. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 19(3), 321-338. https://doi.org/10.54629/jli.v19i3.988
Sitompul, J. (2021). Tantangan Penegakan Hukum Kejahatan Siber di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 51(3), 678-695.
Smith, G. (2021). Corporate Liability for Digital Harassment: An International Perspective on Cyberbullying. Computer Law & Security Review, 41, 105-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2021.105553
Trakman, L. E. (2021). Determining the Accountability of Fintech Platforms: A Contractual vs. Tortious Approach. Journal of International Dispute Settlement, 12(3), 445-468.
Wijaya, M. (2022). Tanggung Jawab Mutlak Korporasi Fintech atas Tindakan Pihak Ketiga dalam Penagihan. Sasi, 28(2), 245-259. https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v28i2.965
Yuniarti, S. (2022). Consumer Protection in Peer-to-Peer Lending: A Regulatory Approach. Padjadjaran Journal of Law, 9(1), 89-106.
Zetzsche, D. A., et al. (2021). The Future of Data-Driven Finance and the Role of AI in Financial Supervision. Stanford Journal of Law, Business & Finance, 26(2), 188-234.
