SIPPABIO VS SPITCEROW: STUDI LITERATUR DUA MODEL PEMETAAN KONFLIK

Authors

  • Retno Angraeni S Universitas Cenderawasih
  • M. Nurwahyudin S Universitas Cenderawasih
  • Arnawan Arief Universitas Cenderawasih
  • Mustakim Mustakim Universitas Cenderawasih

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56015/gjikplp.v13i6.963

Keywords:

Conflict mapping, SIPPABIO, SPITCEROW

Abstract

Conflict Mapping is a critically important analytical instrument in the study of peace and conflict resolution. This paper aims to provide an overview of two conflict mapping models, namely SIPABIO DAN SPITCEROW. Drawing on a literature review of relevant scholarly articles, this paper elaborates on the concepts, characteristics, and comparison of the two conflict mapping models. The findings indicate that SIPPABIO possesses elements that excel in unraveling the initial picture of a conflict, with the model emphasizing the psychological and relational dimensions of conflict. Meanwhile, SPITCEROW contains elements that help reconstruct the dynamics and escalation of conflict. These two mapping models are complementary and can be used for a more comprehensive conflict analysis. Through this paper, the author recommends that the selection of a model should depend on the research objectives, the characteristics of the conflict, and other contextual factors surrounding the conflict under study.

References

Abdalla, A., & Sender, M. (2019). C.R. SIPPABIO A Model for Conflict Analysis.

Abdalla, A., & Sender, M. (2023). A Model for Conflict Analysis.

Adham, T. K. I. (2023). Conflict Resolution in Team: Analyzing the of Conflicts and Best Skills for Resolution. Scholars Journal of Engineering and Technology, 11(08), 152–162. https://doi.org/10.36347/sjet.2023.v11i08.001

Anom, E., Noor, D. V., Anom, E. S., & Sinaga, O. (2022). erman anom. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 6(3), 9356–9374.

Aurilia, D., Putra, Z. H., Hermita, N., & Corpiady, J. (2025). STRATEGI PENGUMPULAN DATA KUALITATIF DALAM PENELITIAN IMPLEMENTASI KEBIJAKAN PENDIDIKAN DENGAN METODE SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW (SLR). Didaktik : Jurnal Ilmiah PGSD FKIP UNIVERSITAS MANDIRI, 11(2), 244–253. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.36989/didaktik.v11i02.6903

Barkah, S., & Muhamammad Sobri, K. (2016). DINAMIKA KONFLIK ETNIS DI TOBOALI KABUPATEN BANGKA SELATAN. Jurnal Empirika, 1, 187–202. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.47753/je.v1i2.26

Budd, J. W., Colvin, A. J. S., & Pohler, D. (2020). Advancing Dispute Resolution by Understanding the Sources of Conflict: Toward an Integrated Framework. ILR Review, 73(2), 254–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/0019793919866817

Burgess, H., & Burgess, G. M. (2018). Map the Basic Conflict Elements. https://www.beyondintractability.org/frontiers/map-basic-elements

Dhanushka Rodrigo, W. (2021). DOES C.R. SIPABIO PROVIDE A COMPLETE GUIDE FOR UNDERSTANDING CONFLICTS HOLISTICALLY? https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3859049

Harolds, J., & Wood, B. P. (2006). Conflict management and resolution. Journal of the American College of Radiology, 3(3), 200–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2005.10.005

Hasan, E., Ubaidullah, Apritasari, C. M., Fadlia, F., & Ardiansyah. (2018). Sipabio Analysis in Mapping the Conflict during Simultaneous Local Election 2017 at Kota Sabang. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 175(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/175/1/012165

Hayati, P. N., & Nurharjadmo, W. (2024). Konflik dan Resolusi Konflik Berbasis Collaborative Governance dalam Revitalisasi Kawasan Rowo Jombor. Jurnal Mahasiswa Wacana Publik, 4(1), 162–179. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.20961/wp.v4i1.89671

Issifu, A. K., & Asante, J. J. (2015). An Analysis of Conflicts Using SPITCEROW Model: The Case of Dagbon Chieftaincy Conflict, Ghana. Journal of Alternative Perspectives in the Social Sciences, 7(2), 129–152.

Kivimäki, Timo. (2024). Research handbook on conflict prevention. Edward Elgar Publishing.

Kuupiel, C. M., & Nangwele, L. D. (2023). An Analysis of Political Vigilantism in Ghana Using the Spitcerow Model. Developing Country Studies, 13(2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.7176/dcs/13-2-03

Mitchell, C. (1990). SOME BASIC INITIAL FRAMEWORKS FOR CONFLICT ANALYSIS. https://share.google/ySPPjBZQvbKifd7jS

Mitchell, C. R. (2014). The nature of intractable conflict : resolution in the twenty-first century. Palgrave Macmillan.

Nangwele, L. D. (2023). A Spitcerow Analysis of the Nadowli Chieftaincy Conundrum in the Upper West Region of Ghana. International Journal of African and Asian Studies, 81. https://doi.org/10.7176/jaas/81-04

Network For Conflict Prevention and Peacebuilding. (2020). Conflict Analysis Guidelines.

Owsiak, A. P., & Mitchell, S. M. (2025). Conflict management as an insular strategy? Comparing dyadic learning of dispute resolution strategies across geopolitical issues. Environment and Security, 3(4), 535–554. https://doi.org/10.1177/27538796251333245

Sandole, D. (1998). A Comprehensive Mapping of Conflict and Conflict Resolution: A Three Pillar Approach. Peace and Conflict Studies. https://doi.org/10.46743/1082-7307/1998.1389

Sari, C. M. A., Hasan, E., Ubaidulla, U., Fadlia, F., & Ardiansyah, A. (2018). Analisis Model SIPABIO dalam Pemetaan Potensi Konflik Menjelang Pemilu Legslatif Tahun 2019 di Kabupaten Aceh. Talenta Conference Series: Local Wisdom, Social, and Arts (LWSA), 1(2), 311–316. https://doi.org/10.32734/lwsa.v1i2.214

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039

Thompson, C. J. (2023). Proper punctuation: a qualitative exploration of changes in conflict management processes during revolutionary periods in teams [Pepperdine University]. https://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/etd/1408

Waruwu, M. (2023). Pendekatan Penelitian Pendidikan: Metode Penelitian Kualitatif, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif dan Metode Penelitian Kombinasi (Mixed Method). Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 7(1), 2896–2910. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31004/jptam.v7i1.6187

Wasserfuhr, V., & Veldkamp, B. (2022). A Literature Review of Methods, Approaches and Tools to Automate the Process of Systematic Literature Reviews. University of Twente.

Wehr, P. (2018). Conflict Regulation. Routledge.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-14

Issue

Section

Articles